Volvo XC90 2006 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 319 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 25 HP more power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Jeep Commander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 13.3 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 620 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo XC70 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Commander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Commander, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1950 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 443 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`760 | 2`812 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |