Volvo XC90 2006 vs BMW X5 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 62 HP less power than BMW X5, but torque is 5 NM more than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.2 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1750 litres | |
| In 5-seat version BMW X5 has more luggage space (by 7 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 87 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| BMW X5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC90 has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than BMW X5, so BMW X5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 9800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |