Volvo XC90 2002 vs Lexus RX 2003

 
Volvo XC90
2002 - 2006
Lexus RX
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.9 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 272 HP204 HP
Torque: 380 NM283 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds9 seconds
Volvo XC90 engine produces 68 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Lexus RX. Despite the higher power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.012.2
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo XC90 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 530 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway760 km on highway
Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.74 m
Width: 1.90 m1.84 m
Height: 1.74 m1.68 m
Volvo XC90 is larger.
Volvo XC90 is 6 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 249 litres439 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2404 litres2130 litres
Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 190 litres less trunk space than the Lexus RX. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 274 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.7 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`7602`380
Safety: no data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 44006800
Rating in user reviews: 9.1/10 9.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC90 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Lexus RX has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv