Volvo XC90 2002 vs Dodge Durango 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 5.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 236 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 20.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 36 HP more power than Dodge Durango, but torque is 27 NM less than Dodge Durango. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 10.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 16.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 11 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 2482 litres | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 283 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Durango. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 78 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`760 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |