Volvo XC90 2002 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 2002 and Volvo XC90 2010 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volvo XC90 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 2002 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 2002 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 2002 is smaller. Volvo XC90 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 2002 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 249 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 2010 has more luggage space (by 364 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 2002 (by 567 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 2002 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90 2010. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`735 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |