Volvo XC90 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.86 m | |
| Volvo XC90 and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`735 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |