Volvo XC90 2002 vs Land Rover Discovery 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 445 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Volvo XC90 engine produces 27 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Despite less power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 82 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.89 m | |
Volvo XC90 is smaller. Volvo XC90 is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 15 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 1192 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1192 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`735 | 3`230 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |