Volvo XC90 2002 vs Hyundai Terracan 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 13 HP more power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Hyundai Terracan. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC90 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30 | Used also on Kia Carnival | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC90 is 9 cm longer than the Hyundai Terracan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 1955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 921 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Terracan. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 449 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Hyundai Terracan, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`735 | 2`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |