Volvo XC90 2002 vs Dodge Durango 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 5.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Dodge Durango) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 236 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 20.2 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 73 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 67 NM less than Dodge Durango. Despite less power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 8.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 16.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 7.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1155 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 11 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 2482 litres | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 283 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Durango. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 78 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`735 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |