Volvo XC90 2003 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 2003 and Volvo XC90 2006 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 11.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo XC90 2003 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 2003 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC90 2003 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC90 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volvo XC90 2003 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90 2006, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 2003 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 249 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 2006 has more luggage space (by 364 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 2003 (by 567 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 2003 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90 2006. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`720 | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |