Volvo XC90 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004

 
Volvo XC90
2003 - 2006
Honda CR-V
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 210 HP162 HP
Torque: 320 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 secondsn/a seconds
Volvo XC90 engine produces 48 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Honda CR-V.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.010.1
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo XC90 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway610 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years15 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.54 m
Width: 1.90 m1.78 m
Height: 1.74 m1.71 m
Volvo XC90 is larger.
Volvo XC90 is 26 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 12 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 249 litres525 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2404 litres952 litres
Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 276 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 1452 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.7 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`7201`910
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Honda CR-V has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC90 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 44003200
Rating in user reviews: 9.1/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC90 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Honda CR-V has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv