Volvo XC90 2005 vs Volvo XC90 2010

 
Volvo XC90
2005 - 2005
Volvo XC90
2010 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP163 HP
Torque: 340 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds11.8 seconds
Volvo XC90 2005 and Volvo XC90 2010 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volvo XC90 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.08.5
The Volvo XC90 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo XC90 2005 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 2005 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway970 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.81 m
Width: 1.90 m1.91 m
Height: 1.74 m1.78 m
Volvo XC90 2005 is smaller.
Volvo XC90 2005 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 2005 is 4 cm lower.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 249 litres249 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data249 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 249 litres613 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2404 litres1837 litres
In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 2010 has more luggage space (by 364 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 2005 (by 567 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.7 meters12.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 2005 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90 2010.
Gross weight (kg): 2`7352`680
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 44009000
Rating in user reviews: 9.1/10 8.9/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC90 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo XC90 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv