Volvo XC90 2005 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.1 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.86 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 249 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 1700 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space (by 166 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 704 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`735 | 2`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |