Volvo XC90 2005 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 and Toyota Land Cruiser have the same engine power, but Volvo XC90 torque is 3 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 2005 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC90 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.90 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`735 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.1/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |