Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998

 
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1986
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2000
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP150 HP
Torque: 184 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds9.1 seconds
Volkswagen Bora is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 14 HP less power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.09.3
Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.38 m
Width: 1.71 m1.74 m
Height: 1.38 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Passat is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Bora, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data785 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`825
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 16001400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volkswagen Bora has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv