Volvo XC90 2024 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 635 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 3.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 335 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 330 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 12.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 280 mm (11 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1856 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`790 kg | 3`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`028 kg | 2`485 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 762 kg | 765 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 59 600 | 87 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |