Volvo XC90 2024 vs BMW X5 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Volvo XC90) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X5) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 100 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 340 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 7.2 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 214 mm (8.4 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 3 cm longer than the BMW X5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 300 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1856 litres | 1870 litres | |
| In 7-seat version BMW X5 has more luggage space (by 345 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 14 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`790 kg | 3`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`028 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 762 kg | 660 kg | |
| Volvo XC90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than BMW X5. Therefore, Volvo XC90 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 58 400 | 50 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |