Volvo XC90 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 54 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.0 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo XC90 has 120 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 431 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |