Volvo XC90 2015 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 14 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.0 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |