Volvo XC90 2015 vs BMW X5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 41 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.6 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1510 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC90 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from twelve 4x4 versions of Volvo XC90 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| BMW X5 2015 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X5 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Volvo XC90 has 35 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |