Volvo XC90 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 72 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.4 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo XC90 has 120 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 431 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |