Volvo XC90 2016 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 31 HP more power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 20 NM less than Mercedes ML. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes ML 2011 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |