Volvo XC90 2018 vs BMW X5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 4 HP more power than BMW X5, but torque is 20 NM less than BMW X5. Despite the higher power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1510 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X5 2015 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X5 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 6 cm longer than the BMW X5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 35 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |