Volvo XC90 2015 vs BMW X5 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 36 HP more power than BMW X5, but torque is 100 NM less than BMW X5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.8 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Volvo XC90 has 35 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 29 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |