Volvo XC90 2018 vs Audi Q7 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Volvo XC90) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Audi Q7) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 303 HP | 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 51 HP more power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Audi Q7. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 85 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is smaller, but slightly higher. Volvo XC90 is 10 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 250 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 615 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1816 litres | 1955 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 520 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 139 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi Q7. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 34 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
| |