Volvo XC90 2015 vs Mercedes ML 2011

 
Volvo XC90
2015 - 2017
Mercedes ML
2011 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Hybrid2.1 Diesel
Hybrid engines (Volvo XC90) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Mercedes ML), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads.

Performance

Power: 320 HP204 HP
Torque: 400 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.6 seconds9 seconds
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo XC90 engine produces 116 HP more power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 100 NM less than Mercedes ML. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 2.16.0
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo XC90 consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 2380 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mercedes ML 2011 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system.

Dimensions

Length: 4.95 m4.80 m
Width: 1.92 m1.93 m
Height: 1.78 m1.80 m
Volvo XC90 is 15 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 is 2 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 250 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 250 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 615 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1816 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12.5 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 3`010no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 24 40018 200
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC90 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mercedes ML has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv