Volvo XC90 2010 vs Audi Q7 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 243 HP | 333 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 90 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.7 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC90 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Volvo XC90 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is smaller, but higher. Volvo XC90 is 28 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 600 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 2035 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 175 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |