Volvo XC90 2007 vs Volvo XC60 2010

 
Volvo XC90
2007 - 2010
Volvo XC60
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 238 HP243 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds9.9 seconds
Volvo XC90 engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.09.9
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo XC90 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 315 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes.

Dimensions

Length: 4.81 m4.63 m
Width: 1.90 m1.89 m
Height: 1.74 m1.71 m
Volvo XC90 is larger.
Volvo XC90 is 18 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 is 3 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 249 litres495 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 249 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 613 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1837 litresno data
In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 118 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.5 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: no data2`430 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

high
Average price (€): 70007600
Rating in user reviews: 8.9/10 7.1/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC90 has
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volvo XC60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv