Volvo XC90 2002 vs Volvo XC90 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Volvo XC90 2002 and Volvo XC90 2010 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.5 | |
Volvo XC90 2002 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2010, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90 2010, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 530 litres | 613 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 1837 litres | |
In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 2010 has more luggage space (by 83 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 2002 (by 567 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 2002 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90 2010. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`680 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 8400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |