Volvo XC90 2002 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 2002 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 2002 engine produces 62 HP more power than Volvo XC90 2006, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volvo XC90 2006. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.9 | 11.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 2002 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 2002 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volvo XC90 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90 2006, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 2002 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 249 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 2006 has more luggage space (by 364 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 2002 (by 567 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 2002 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90 2006. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |