Volvo XC90 2010 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 243 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 2010 and Volvo XC90 2006 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 11.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 500'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 2010 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC90 2006, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 2404 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 2010 has more luggage space (by 83 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 2006 (by 567 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 2010 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90 2006. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`760 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |