Volvo XC90 2019 vs Toyota Highlander 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 55 HP more power than Toyota Highlander, but torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Highlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.8 | |
| Volvo XC90 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 453 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1886 litres | 2387 litres | |
|
Toyota Highlander has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Highlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 501 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Highlander, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`708 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 600 | 47 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |