Volvo XC90 2019 vs Toyota Highlander 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota Highlander, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Toyota Highlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.8 | |
| Volvo XC90 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 368 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1868 litres | 2387 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 519 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Highlander, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`750 kg | 2`708 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 800 | 46 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |