Volvo XC90 2019 vs BMW X5 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 18 HP more power than BMW X5, but torque is 100 NM less than BMW X5. Despite the higher power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60, Volvo S90 | Used also on BMW 5 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 3 cm longer than the BMW X5, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1870 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 282 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 200 | 59 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |