Volvo XC90 2019 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 58 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC90 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Land Cruiser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC90 is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 15 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 621 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 253 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 47 200 | 52 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |