Volvo XC90 2019 vs Toyota Highlander 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Highlander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 30 HP less power than Toyota Highlander, but torque is 60 NM more than Toyota Highlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 453 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2387 litres | |
|
Toyota Highlander has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Highlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Highlander, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`750 kg | 2`708 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 600 | 44 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |