Volvo XC90 2019 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 14 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is smaller. Volvo XC90 is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 639 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 271 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 49 400 | 115 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |