Volvo XC90 2019 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 14 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 7 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 780 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 412 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 46 000 | 58 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |