Volvo XC90 2019 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 31 HP more power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jaguar F-Pace. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | Used also on Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.67 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1868 litres | 1804 litres | |
| Volvo XC90 has 387 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`750 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 600 | 34 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |