Volvo XC90 2019 vs BMW X6 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 165 HP less power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 280 NM less than BMW X6. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.2 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger. Volvo XC90 is 2 cm longer than the BMW X6, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1530 litres | |
|
BMW X6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 212 litres less trunk space than the BMW X6. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW X6, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 46 000 | 71 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
BMW X6 has
| |