Volvo XC90 2019 vs Audi Q7 2022
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Audi Q7) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 261 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 26 HP less power than Audi Q7, but torque is 110 NM more than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 15.50 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 402 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 368 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1971 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 200 | 44 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |