Volvo XC90 2014 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 3.0 - 6.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 320 HP | 247 - 468 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 480 NM | 347 - 624 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 - 9.4 seconds | 5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.1 - 8.1 | 7.5 - 14.7 | |
|
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 5.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | 211 - 218 mm (8.3 - 8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 12 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 167 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 332 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`880 | ~ 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |