Volvo XC90 2014 vs Mercedes ML 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes ML can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.1 - 4.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 320 HP | 204 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 480 NM | 370 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 - 9.4 seconds | 6.1 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.1 - 8.1 | 6.0 - 9.3 | |
|
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo XC90 is 15 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`880 | ~ 2`917 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |