Volvo XC90 2014 vs Audi Q7 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo XC90
2014 - 2019
Audi Q7
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo XC90 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi Q7 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 190 - 320 HP218 - 333 HP
Torque: 350 - 480 NM370 - 600 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.6 - 9.4 seconds6.1 - 7.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 2.1 - 8.15.5 - 8.1
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi Q7. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.95 m5.03 m
Width: 1.94 m1.97 m
Height: 1.78 m1.74 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 8 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 615 litres770 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1886 litres1955 litres
Audi Q7 has more luggage space.
Volvo XC90 has 155 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q7. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 69 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.5 meters12.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi Q7.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`880~ 2`844
Safety:
Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 27 40039 000
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC90 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Audi Q7 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv