Volvo XC90 2010 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volvo XC90 2010 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 2006 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.2 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 243 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 420 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 11.8 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.5 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
|
Volvo XC90 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90 2006. On average, Volvo XC90 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 2010 and Volvo XC90 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 600 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 2010 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC90 2010 has 351 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`718 | ~ 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |