Volvo XC90 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Volvo XC90 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.4 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 - 243 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
Torque: | 320 - 420 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 11.8 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.5 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
Volvo XC90 is larger. Volvo XC90 is 18 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 600 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1455 litres | |
Volvo XC90 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC90 has 105 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 382 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`718 | ~ 2`499 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 12 000 | 9000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |