Volvo XC90 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 4.4 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 315 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 440 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 13.5 | 8.2 - 14.0 | |
|
Volvo XC90 2006 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90 2002. On average, Volvo XC90 2006 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 2006 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC90 2002, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 2006 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 2404 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 2002 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 2006 has 281 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90 2002. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 2006 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 2002 (by 567 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 2006 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`735 | ~ 2`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |