Volvo XC90 2006 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.4 - 4.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 - 315 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
Torque: | 320 - 440 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 13.5 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.77 m | 1.71 m | |
Volvo XC90 is larger. Volvo XC90 is 18 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1455 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 246 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 382 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`735 | ~ 2`499 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | high | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 9000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.6/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |