Volvo XC90 2006 vs BMW X5 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volvo XC90 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas BMW X5 is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 4.4 | 3.0 - 4.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 315 HP | 235 - 355 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 440 NM | 315 - 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12 seconds | 6.5 - 8.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 13.5 | 8.1 - 12.0 | |
|
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1750 litres | |
| Volvo XC90 has 371 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 87 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`735 | ~ 2`753 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 9800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |