Volvo XC90 2002 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.4 - 4.4 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 - 315 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
Torque: | 320 - 440 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 14.0 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
Volvo XC90 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90 2006. On average, Volvo XC90 2002 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90 2006, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 2002 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 249 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 1837 litres | |
Volvo XC90 2002 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo XC90 2002 has 281 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90 2006. The Volvo XC90 2006 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 2002 (by 567 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 2002 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90 2006. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`737 | ~ 2`735 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 8400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |